The client facing a lopsided term

arfanJK6

The distribution of a common territory or the conditions under which two sides can benefit will only be achieved with Integrative bargaining which have economic logic true fact drives the outcome for both sides benefit in mind. In the contrary with face value we tend to process with distributive bargaining because I am the boss syndrome is much in place when people practice Face value .


As the result only one party s gain and the other party s loss. But if we can look around we see more leader practice Face value than Fact value at work . Are you re the Face practitioner or Fact practitioner Perhaps as Katie Johnston suggested it time we practice the The Art of Haggling VICTOR NG PROPRIETOR LAW FIRM In my line of work when negotiating South Africa WhatsApp Number List contracts I always adopt a mutual interest value approach. Thank God the lawyers I deal with know their work and normally are understanding of each party s interest and strive to strike a balance instead of forcing a lopsided deal so that takes alot of the hardwork out of the process of negotiation. When it comes to technical issues it s always best left to the professionals.





Sometimes the other party don t care about a client s interest because they think they can arm wrestle with you thinking they have an upper hand it s a seller s market if you don t buy from me there are many more lying in wait .  in the contract may be hard pressed to accept it because he is getting a good deal buying below market price. The issue faced by either party is always how badly do you want to conclude the deal. Are you going to focus on the big picture and accept a little risk or inconvenience On an economic level whether as a consumer or a producer seller I believe that our powers of negotiation on the price are very much restricted and tied to market forces.